Nevertheless she reiterates the New York Times party line by saying:
"But let’s face it, life is filled with all kinds of tests — some you ace and some you flunk — so at some point you have to get used to it."
I beg to differ. Life is full of all kinds of situations that test you. Life is not full of multiple choice memorization tests at all.
She quotes experts who argue how testing is killing our children, but somehow, amazingly, decides testing is good. The real question is why the New York Times is constantly beating the testing drum. There is lots of money to be made in textbook publishing and testing and those who make big money on that are always in favor of testing and have been the ones pushing No Child Left Behind. Time to come clean, New York Times. How much money are you making on testing?